I’ve gotten a great response from my AIT stock pitch, and wanted to provide some additional commentary.

My goal for the presentation was to provide a clean look-and-feel, and not clutter the slides with tons of bullet points (the finer details would come out during the discussion).

Here are some talking points which loosely translate to my actual presentation. Hope it provides some further explanation/clarification.

Company Overview

AIT - Company Overview

  • AIT provides distribution, repair, and value-added services for industrial customers
  • Distribution network provides a competitive advantage (if machinery goes down, customers need to get it up and running ASAP. more distribution centers – > faster response time)
  • Growing part of business is fluid power (~20% of sales). Higher margins than traditional industrial distribution

Investment Thesis

AIT - Investment Thesis

  • Catalyst in the form of industry tailwinds
  • Exceptional management team ensures company meets those targets (history of outperforming competition)
  • Market volatility provides an entry point. Valuation is attractive considering hidden value on balance sheet and temporarily depressed earnings due to ERP installation

Industry Tailwinds

AIT - Industry Tailwinds

  • Consistent increase in book value even through a severe recession
  • AIT’s revenues are correlated with the MCU index, usually on a 6 month lag. Should benefit as industrial capacity continues to expand
  • MCU index is still below long-term average (LT avg: just shy of 80%)
  • Other economic indicators (i.e. PMI) show expansion as well, albeit at a slower pace than the last several quarters
  • Company is forecasting industrial growth of 5% in 2012, and 4% in 2013

Management Review

AIT - Management Review

  • AIT is substantially outperforming competition on most efficiency metrics
  • Outperformance is being achieved with no leverage. Just paid off last of outstanding debt in 2011 (at unattractive interest rates). Competitors debt-to-equity ratios average 65-75%
  • Dividends increasing 10% per year, while share outstanding are trending downwards (great situation). Management expects to be more aggressive in the buyback market going forward.

Hidden Value

AIT - Hidden Value

  • AIT already significantly cheaper than competitors on P/TangBV basis, but even more so after making several adjustments to book value
  • LIFO reserve of $138m – old inventory on books for below replacement cost
  • Unlike competitors, AIT owns a significant number of its distribution centers (134 owned branches), many of which were purchased prior to 1980. Adding 750k per location nets an additional $100.5m in additional value.
  • Market view is focused on ERP/SAP implementation and its short-term effect on earnings. Significant capex and operating expenses in 2012, but AIT is still expected to grow margins and earnings by 10-15%. Project should provide significant operating improvements starting in 2013.

Valuation

AIT - Valuation

  • Conservative assumptions: 8% growth in next fiscal year, ratcheting downward to steady state of 3% by 2019
  • Margin expansion of 100 basis points by 2016 due to increased fluid power business and effects of ERP implementation (by comparison, competitor’s ERP implementation helped to increase margins by 300 basis points over several years after installation)
  • Approx 1% per year reduction in share count, due to management signals of increased buybacks
  • Capex returning to normal levels after ERP installation is complete in 2012/2013
  • Plenty of room to optimize capital structure and lower overall cost of capital by taking on conservative amount of debt

Risks

AIT - Risks

  • ERP implementation is a big project ($71m over 4 years), but management seems confident in its current progress
  • David Pugh retiring in October (has lead company to compound annual return of 18.1% over past 10 years). Expects to remain significant shareholder in company
  • Threat of double-dip recession is still out there, although 24 out of 30 target markets were showing growth on the latest conference call
  • Some business is insulated slightly from recession (i.e. AIT’s customers can put off buying large piece of capital equipment, but harder to put off hydraulic fluid to run existing machines).
  • Business held up pretty well during latest recession – sales down only 8.5% in 2009 and 1.5% in 2010 before recovering significantly in fiscal 2011
Disclosure: No positions.

Stock Pitch Competition Results – AIT

Posted September 23rd, 2011. Filed under Stock Analysis

As I mentioned previously, I decided to go back to school for my MBA at the University of North Carolina with the intentions of pursuing investing full-time.

I joined the Investment Management Club, and just finished participating in the internal stock pitch competition – and I ended up winning 1st place!

The goal of the competition is to introduce students to the mechanics of delivering an effective stock pitch – developing a thesis, performing a full valuation, presenting in front of judges, etc. – and was designed to be a “low-pressure” way to practice for the more high-profile competitions.

We had 7 minutes to deliver the pitch, with a 3-5 minute Q/A session to follow. Stocks had to be in the Industrials sector, with a minimum market cap of $500m.

I ended up choosing Applied Industrial Technologies (AIT), a $1.2b industrial distributor. I’ve included my presentation below:

[scribd id=73944220 key=key-1ne3g7jmml3dxra99bwe mode=list]

 

Next up: UNC will be hosting the Alpha Challenge in November, one of the premier MBA stock pitch competitions.

Needless to say, I’m looking forward to it!

Disclosure: No positions.

I am excited to share this guest post and great write-up on Repro-Med Systems (REPR). A bit of background info about the author, in his own words: “My name is Frank Lind. I am an individual investor living in Taiwan. My investment approach is to take concentrated positions in high-quality nano-cap and micro-cap stocks. I look for good growth prospects and some kind of competitive advantage at a cheap price.”

Repro-Med Systems (REPR) is a great little company which is basically undiscovered by the market. The best part about this company is its high-margin recurring revenue stream. This is explained later in this report.

Investment highlights:

l  The sale of one of their subcutaneous infusion pumps guarantees at least a six year recurring revenue stream to the company.

l  The FREEDOM60(R) Syringe Infusion Pump is the only Medicare-funded pump for Subcutaneous Immune Globulin (SCIG).

l  Its product is the most technologically superior and the cheapest.

l  Revenue has grown from 1.7 million to 4.7 million over the last 4 years.

l  Net Income has steadily grown from ($254,000) to +$704,085 over the last 4 years.

l  Earnings are accelerating due to the rapid growth of the use of subcutaneously administered immune-deficiency drugs.

l  The company is expanding its manufacturing capacity to keep up with demand.

l  Growing medical companies are recession-proof.

What does this company do?

REPR has two main products. The main product, and the main driver of growth, is the Freedom-60. The Freedom-60 is a specialized infusion pump that administers various types of drugs to patients subcutaneously rather than intravenously. This means the drug is injected into the fat of the body just under the skin, rather than the vein.

Their second product is called the RES-Q-VAC. This is a portable suction pump. Sales of this product are trending up, but are lumpy and not really important to the valuation of this business. Thus, this entire report will concentrate on the Freedom-60.

The advantages of subcutaneous administration

Currently, the most widespread use of subcutaneous administration is for primary immunodeficiency disease using drugs called immunoglobulins. These help individuals with immune deficiencies to live a more normal life. The two main drugs in this area are Vivaglobin and Hizentra – both made by CSL Behring.

People are switching to subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) because:
– It is more convenient because treatment can be done at home rather than at a hospital.
– It costs less.
– There are less adverse reactions.
– Since treatment is generally done weekly instead of monthly,

the immunity level remains more constant, which should help keep the patient more healthy.

Further research on the superior efficacy of (SCIG) can be found here and here.

Therefore, the market for this kind of therapy is rapidly growing with an estimated 10 million people with this disorder.

Enter Repro-Med Systems and the Freedom-60 infusion pump.

Competitive advantages of the Freedom-60

  1. 1. The company’s 10-K states – “In June 2007, Medicare issued a letter of clarification stating in part:

“The FREEDOM60(R) Syringe Infusion Pump is the only allowable pump to be billed with the Subcutaneous Immune Globulin (SCIG). …All other pumps or modifiers will result in a denial.”

This is important for several reasons.

First, the lack of funding for other devices creates a huge competitive advantage against other companies.

Second, application for funding takes a considerable amount of time, as bureaucracies tend to move at snail’s pace. Thus, if any company has noticed this niche market, it is going to take considerable time before they can possibly get a device approved. In that time, so many more Freedom-60s will have been sold and the recurring revenue stream can be secured.

Third, there is NO guarantee that potential competitors can actually receive Medicare funding approval. In my communications with the CEO, he described the approval process as something of a “black art”. He surmised the reason the Freedom-60 received funding was because of its superior performance and its extremely competitive price point. He also said, should a multi-national decide to compete in this niche market, it would make more sense to acquire his company than go through the process of

a) actually developing a product at such a low price-point

b) developing the years of know-how that have gone into the Freedom-60.

2. The Freedom-60 is technologically superior to more expensive (non-Medicare funded electronic infusion pumps). This is best summarized by the 10-K –

    “Our proprietary technology employed in the FREEDOM60(R) uses constant pressure to administer drugs. FREEDOM60(R) avoids an important problem faced by electronic pumps currently on the market, which employ constant flow mechanisms that result in potentially dangerous, high pressure placed on indwelling catheters or under the skin. In order to protect the patients, these pumps must contain an overpressure sensor to shut the pump off when a potentially threatening pressure is detected. Some of these electronic pumps generate extremely high pressures exceeding 60psi before the over pressure system will activate. Also with these systems, the alarm can falsely trigger halting administration until a health professional can verify that the infusion is in fact safe and the pump may be reactivated. In either case, the patient is at risk from damaging pressures or not receiving the medication required.

    Other unsafe conditions of conventional equipment include runaway administrations; overdose due to programming errors or pump failure, and over-pressure resulting in burst blood vessels or failed internal access devices. We believe that the increasing sales of pumps and tubing sets for the FREEDOM60(R) demonstrate that the FREEDOM60(R) eliminates these potential outcomes and ensures a safe, constant, controlled infusion. Electronic devices will increase infusion pressure while attempting to continue an infusion at the programmed rate, while the FREEDOM60(R) design maintains a safe constant pressure and thereby automatically reduces the flow rate as required, a process we refer to as “dynamic equilibrium,” if any problems of administration occur.”

    3. Cost-constrained Medicare funding heavily favors cost-efficient devices.

      As can be seen on page 41 here, the Freedom-60 is the cheapest device available on the market. Debates over health-care spending continue, but there is no doubt over the long term cost-containment rules. This plays into Repro-Med’s hands.

      Recurring Revenue

      The best part, from the point of view of investors, is once the Freedom-60 is bought, the patient with immune-deficiency disorders must continuously purchase disposable tubing sets.

      From the 10-K:

      “We estimate that each FREEDOM60(R) pump, when used for immune globulin administration, uses an average of four to six tubing sets per month per patient. Antibiotics may be administered much more frequently, occasionally up to four times per day. In some cases, a tubing set may be used for as long as 72 hours. We estimate tubing set usage for antibiotics to be as much as 10 sets per month per patient. The tubing sets currently have an average price of $5.41.”

      The list price of the Freedom-60 is $399

      The revenue information that they put in the 10-K regarding disposable sales indicates that they are thinking big.

      Pumps in the Market Annual Sales of Disposables

      5,000                                $1,530,000

      10,000                                $3,060,000

      50,000                              $15,300,000

      100,000                             $ 30,600,000

      I think the above table speaks for itself

      The tubing sets are patented and only Repro-Med’s tubing sets will work.

      From the 10-K – “Our patented luer disc connector ensures that only the Company’s FREEDOM60(R) tubing sets will function with the pump. Non-conforming tubing sets, without the patented disc connector, are ejected from the pump to prevent the danger of an overdose or runaway pump from injuring the patient. We are achieving our objective of building a product franchise with FREEDOM60(R) and the sale of patented disposable tubing sets.”

      The other key point about this type of recurring revenue is it allows for continuous improvements in operating margins because dollars are not having to be spent to incur new sales.

      Valuation

      Revenues are currently growing at more than 40% annually with earnings currently growing more than 100% sequentially.

      Furthermore, the automatic recurring revenue through the tubing sets will certainly allow significant operating [not gross] margin improvements.

      25% compounded revenue growth over 4 years is easily achievable

      Operating Margins should rise from 25% to at least 30%.

      Assume the shares outstanding are about 40 million in 4 years.

      So, TTM Revenue compounded at 25% for 4 years = $12,800.997

      30% operating margin = Operating Income of $3,840,299

      Tax of 35% = Net Income of $2,496,194

      Divided by share count of 40,000,000

      = EPS in 4 years of 0.0624

      Now choose various PE ratios to give a 4-year price target.

      I chose a PE of 14. I believe this to be conservative given the quality of the company’s business model

      Multiplying these two gives a price target of $0.87 vs the current price of $0.37

      Over 4 years, growth in price from $0.87 from $0.37 is a return of 23.83% per year.

      Further points of interest:

      1. According to the immune deficiency organization (primaryimmune.org) there are more SGIG drugs that are going through trials right now. This should further increase demand for SCIG treatment and Freedom60 sales.

      2. On May 20, 2011 REPR received their long anticipated FDA approval for the marketing of their new needle set. It is expected this approval will lead to a significant increase in sales and REPR is undergoing significant manufacturing expansion in anticipation of this.

      Disclosure: The author of this guest post is long REPR.